<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aboriginal Is Not A Religion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://daownunder.wordpress.com/2008/05/25/aboriginal-is-not-a-religion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://daownunder.wordpress.com/2008/05/25/aboriginal-is-not-a-religion/</link>
	<description>Aboriginal news, views, and expression, from Australia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:20:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rosa Cobos</title>
		<link>http://daownunder.wordpress.com/2008/05/25/aboriginal-is-not-a-religion/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosa Cobos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daownunder.wordpress.com/?p=59#comment-95</guid>
		<description>Read your article with most intention.
i know what you mean,though really difficult to understand this background to the original. Are  you suggesting that for finding the ab-original one should look first into oneself? It is easier to label. It is easier to discrimintate... we are doing it inside and outside..of ourselves 
What about... if all of of a suddedn we go deeper and deeper and find that as it is happening in the searching for the origin of mmatter we find that we cannot get any further...there is not origin?.. not in the way we assume it as a concept?

This is really exciting... as a searching and as a reality that is trying to involve our development. No lineal development.... not existing the end.. the goals.  
Thanks John.. for your points of feelings and views... yes.. feelings also change of point.. that depending on context.. the same with ideas. 
Thanks.
Rosa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read your article with most intention.<br />
i know what you mean,though really difficult to understand this background to the original. Are  you suggesting that for finding the ab-original one should look first into oneself? It is easier to label. It is easier to discrimintate&#8230; we are doing it inside and outside..of ourselves<br />
What about&#8230; if all of of a suddedn we go deeper and deeper and find that as it is happening in the searching for the origin of mmatter we find that we cannot get any further&#8230;there is not origin?.. not in the way we assume it as a concept?</p>
<p>This is really exciting&#8230; as a searching and as a reality that is trying to involve our development. No lineal development&#8230;. not existing the end.. the goals.<br />
Thanks John.. for your points of feelings and views&#8230; yes.. feelings also change of point.. that depending on context.. the same with ideas.<br />
Thanks.<br />
Rosa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
